.<
ARCHIVES

God Bless The USA

blogger
blogskins
Google News
Matt Drudge
World Net Daily
Message Boards
contact me at aft_lizard01@yahoo.com
Hitler was a Liberal(socialist)
Choices Video


product of dinah.k
Powered by Blogger

The Quizical Prophecy [views and thoughts from some kansas folks ]

25/08/2004

The Kerry campaign is making a big deal out of possible Bush connections to SWVFT and the mainstream media has swallowed this hook line and sinker but as many friends of mine sat down this weekend we dug up a bunch of Kerry connections between them and there own 527's. Ths was picked up by NewsMax, and nobody else but oh well print this up and hand this out to those who think Bush is the one playing a smear merchant.

http://http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/8/23/153719.shtml

From Democrats.org, a Web site of the Democratic National Committee, May 9, 2003:
“The Democratic Party is partnering with MoveOn.org, People for the American Way, Campaign for America's Future, and dozens of other groups representing millions of Americans to organize a massive public mobilization. On Wednesday, May 14, join us by calling and emailing your representatives in Congress to let them know that the majority of Americans oppose more irresponsible tax cuts that go overwhelmingly to the wealthiest sliver of Americans.”
“In their own words, DNC coordination with MoveOn.org,” noted a reader from Florence, S.C., one of several who sent this tip.
http://www.democrats.org/wvc/weekinreview/200305120002.html
'Kicking Ass'
From the same Web site’s unironically named “Kicking Ass: Daily Dispatches from the DNC,” here’s the ultimate in hypocrisy last Nov. 13 from one of Vermont’s more extreme ideologues:
“Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, took a short break from the 30-hour Republican hypocrisy-a-thon to come and see the results of the DNC's petition drive. We collected more than 310,000 signatures and comments from Americans who stand with Senate Democrats in the fight to keep ultraconservative ideologues off the federal bench.”
An accompanying photo has this caption: “DNC Chief Operating Officer Josh Wachs (left), Senator Leahy, and Zack Exley from Moveon.org pose with the more than 310,000 signatures.”
http://www.democrats.org/blog/display/00010183.html
In its push to obstruct judges who follow the U.S. Constitution, DNC admitted elsewhere on its site that same day, “The DNC is also conducting a major petition drive in partnership with MoveOn.org. More than 310,000 Americans have signed the petition to protect our courts — with more than 172,000 of those signatures coming in the past 36 hours.”
http://www.democrats.org/news/200311140002.html
And here’s DNC’s “Kicking Ass” item from Jan. 31:
Catch the Moveon ad during the Super Bowl
Here's a message from Moveon.org:
This Sunday, during the Super Bowl half time show, join us in changing channels on CBS. At 8:10pm and 8:35pm EST, switch over to CNN to watch "Child's Pay" on a channel which doesn't censor its ads. We'd like to keep a tally of the number of people who participate — you can sign up here.
Posted by DNC Research
http://www.democrats.org/blog/comment/00010377.html
MoveOn’s Web site admitted Aug. 9, “We're running a contest to help us choose the ads that will best convince undecided and swing voters to vote for John Kerry.”
http://www.moveon.org/pac/news/best-ad.html
Kerry's Letter
The same site still posts a “letter to MoveOn members from John Kerry,” dated June 17, 2003. “Make no mistake, we need to take back the White House in 2004 and that’s why I’m running for President,” Kerry writes.
http://www.moveon.org/pac/cands/kerry.html
A posting on “the official Kerry-Edwards blog” last Dec. 11 includes this boast from one Fe Bongolan of Berkeley, Calif.:
“The East Bay for Kerry/MoveOn House party on December 7th combined the forces of two grass-roots organizations based in San Francisco East Bay Area. We had 200 guests eating, drinking, and watching the MoveOn Documentary ‘Uncovered’ featuring Joseph Wilson and Rand Beers from the Kerry campaign.
“When Teresa Heinz-Kerry arrived, she handed me a pin that read in the center: ‘Asses of Evil’ with ‘Bush’, ‘Cheney’, ‘Rumsfeld’ and ‘Ashcroft’ surrounding it. She met, greeted and talked to a jam-packed room of Kerry supporters and others who came for the MoveOn documentary. …
“Thanks to Teresa, we kept the party going on, and she helped us here at East Bay for Kerry, throw the Mother of All House Parties.”
http://blog.johnkerry.com/blog/archives/000871.html
From the liberal Minneapolis Star Tribune: “Sam Kaplan, one of Kerry's biggest and earliest fundraisers in Minnesota, said he plans to continue raising money working with Americans [sic] Coming Together.” (Hint to the Star Tribune: That pro-Kerry group calls itself America Coming Together.)
The reader from St. Louis Park, Minn., who sent this tip pointed out, “This is a more direct, admitted coordination link than anything asserted in the New York Times.”
Consider this July 26 posting on BushCountry.org:
Do identical donation pages tracking unique team numbers show relationship between John Kerry's campaign and MoveOn.org?
The Judge Napolitano on The big Story on Fox News just showed a Letter from Moveon asking for contributions to John Kerry with a link. That link ended in Team=437 at the end of the link.
Now go to: http://www.Johnkerry.com and highlight the "Make a Contribution Link": /contribute3.johnkerry.co...l?team=138 It says team=138.
The Donation pages are identical in nature, form, and function in the sense they track the donations back to moveon.
Therefore they are tracking donations specific from Moveon thus applying a causal relationship between the two of them.
It is interesting that the PAC donation section on moveon no longer has a team number attached, but the letter shown on fox did.
How did they get assigned a team number for contributions of Team Number 437 if they are not in a relationship?
Looking at the HTML source and at the link at the end of this sentence: Contribute to Senator Kerry's Presidential campaign here. It still shows a "team=349" URL like this:
Contribute to Senator Kerry's Presidential campaignhere
So, one has to ask the question: Who assigned Moveon.org the "Team=349" for use on their PAC page?
Still, the Kerry site is clearly using 'tracking numbers' to gauge the source and effectiveness of various 'campaign materials'
What do they gain by having a unique team number? Have them explain that one to the Federal Elections Commission
http://bushcountry.org/john_kerry/g_031404_withheld_moveon_kerry.htm
MoveOn's Link to Kerry and Cahill
A reader from New Jersey sent this e-mail he received on July 22 that shows MoveOn's ties to Kerry and his campaign manager, Mary Beth Cahill.
From: Eli Pariser, MoveOn PAC To: Jim Shorts Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 2:34 PM Subject: Watch Kerry's big speech together.
The Kerry-Edwards campaign is holding house parties all over the country to celebrate Kerry's big speech next Thursday. Attend a house party in your area or host one yourself. Dear MoveOn member, A week from today, John Kerry will give the climactic speech at the Democratic National Convention, and the race to win the general election will be officially on. The speech will be one of the biggest political moments we'll have between now and the election, and it'll offer Kerry an opportunity to lay out his vision for the future of our country.
The Kerry-Edwards campaign wants to kick off this final phase of the campaign with a burst of grassroots energy, so all over the country folks are holding house parties to watch the speech. The parties will be linked together by a nation-wide conference call with John Edwards.
Hosting or attending a Kerry-Edwards house party is a great way to celebrate this fun and important event. To attend a party, just go to:
https://volunteer.johnkerry.com/event/search/?MilesFrom=25&Zip=&TimeSpan=WholeCampaign
To host a party of your own, go to:
http://www.johnkerry.com/convention
Hosting is easy � all you need to do is sign up on the Kerry website and offer people a place to watch. We've copied an email from Mary Beth Cahill, Kerry's Campaign Manager, with more information about the parties.
We'll be headed to house parties on Thursday night, and we hope you can make it too.
Sincerely, --Eli Pariser and the MoveOn PAC Team July 22nd, 2004
P.S. Here's the Kerry campaign's email:
From: Mary Beth Cahill, Kerry-Edwards 2004 Subject: A TV, some friends, and your next president Dear friend,
Next Thursday night, July 29, while John Kerry accepts the Democratic nomination, our supporters everywhere will be gathering to watch at convention parties in thousands of homes, restaurants, and public meeting halls across the country. This is the first time a presidential campaign has ever kicked off the general election with so much energy and grassroots support.
You can set up your own convention party in just minutes here:
http://www.johnkerry.com/convention
Or find one to attend in your town here:
https://volunteer.johnkerry.com/event/search/?MilesFrom=25&Zip=&TimeSpan=WholeCampaign
For millions of Americans, next Thursday night is the beginning of the presidential election. It's an opportunity to bring hundreds of thousands of new people into our campaign. When John Kerry accepts his party's nomination, it will be a special moment -- his one chance to lay out his vision for the country, uninterrupted, and with the undivided attention of the nation.
At thousands of events in 50 states, Washington, D.C., and four territories, our supporters are going to convert this night into an organizing opportunity. Last week we set a goal to sign up 100,000 new volunteers in one night at our convention parties. Now we're poised to blow past that goal.
Holding a convention party is easy. All you need is a television and a few friends. Sign up as a party host so that we can count your event in our total:
http://www.johnkerry.com/convention
Sincerely,
Mary Beth Cahill Campaign Manager
PAID FOR BY MOVEON PAC www.moveonpac.org Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
And Here's George Soros
Is Bush-bashing billionaire George Soros behind polls and "experts" slanted in favor of Kerry? Follow the money trail and decide for yourself.
In an Aug. 21 article headlined "Youth vote could carry Kerry into White House," the Bakersfield Californian newspaper quoted William Galston, director of Center for Information and Research at the University of Maryland, as saying: "It is a mirror-image reversal of the run-up to the Iraq war when the young were supportive. They are now disillusioned and confused with a situation where there is continuing carnage and no end in sight."
Galston, it turns out, is a "founding principal" of something that calls itself Democracy Collaborative.
http://cbvps.tempdomainname.com/vhosts/democracycollaborative.org/htdocs/about/leadership.html
And who funds Democracy Collaborative? George Soros.
http://www.osi-az.org/network.shtml
Like-Minded Employers
As NewsMax.com reported Sunday, Kerry refuses to fire Zach Exley, a campaign staffer who was a director for MoveOn.org.
And, of course, Jim Jordan, formerly Kerry’s campaign manager, continues his work at the pro-Kerry Media Fund.
Although the Times and its countless imitators have for days made Kerry’s latest attacks on Bush and Swift Boats Veterans for Truth their lead story, note that they didn’t offer similar publicity when Bush’s campaign and the Republican National Committee on March 31 accused Kerry’s campaign of illegal coordination with anti-Bush groups.
"Senator Kerry, who supported the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act, is now the beneficiary of the single largest conspiracy to violate campaign-finance laws in history," RNC Chief Counsel Jill Holtzman Vogel said at the time.
Kerry’s adviser Michael Meehan claimed at the time: "This frivolous complaint is not worth the paper it is written on. John Kerry and his campaign have nothing to do with these ads or the groups that run them."

Ok here is the deal. We the ones who are politically acute can smell desperation when a candidate goes outside the norm. Kerry is that desperate person, he is desperate like a fox. Why am I saying this? Because Kerry made a desperate gamble about the SwiftVets, and for now it is definately working. We the proud members of the Republican Party are sometimes too trustworthy in our opponents abilities to crash and burn, and it was just this close for the Kerry Campaign to do just that. But out of 10 people I have talked to in the past 4 days only 2 people support Bush and believe he is not behind these ads, ouch. These are decidedly undecided people, they still dont know who they are voting for but they for now do not like this perceived dirty pool.

One of these undecideds is a black vietnam veteran who voted for Bush in 2000. He does not like Kerry, not one bit. He feels like many Viet Vets that Kerry betrayed them and this country, and feels that if so many veterans from Kerry's own unit dont like him and wont vote for him that there is something to it. He explains to me, and this is something I understand well, that in most units in the military there is at least one person that is so arrogant and so dislikable that he draws the distrust and dislike fom the rest of the unit, this is normal. But he is ticked off because he believes that in fact it was the President behind these ads, and to him although he dislikes Kerry its a totally different story when a President, according to him, supports a group who slams his war record. And I quote " The group should have stuck to Kerry's anti-war activities not his war activities."

He is still leaning towards Bush, but he will not vote for Kerry under any circumstances so to him its Bush or nobody, and there is a real chance its nobody with him. I have received similar responses although 50% of this group of ten said they still could vote for Kerry, 3 are still leaning Bush and 2 like my friend above say they are leaning Bush or nobody and they are the only 2 veterans in my small informal non-scientific poll.

I dont know why the RNC have sat on there hands on this one. Do they think that any polling change will be fixed by the convention and so they will save there money? Or are they waiting for this to blow over so they can counteract with commercials attacking Kerry on the same accusations they accuse Bush of? Either way with 14 commercials coming out from Moveon.org, continuing headlines from liberal newspapers across the land attacking Bush, a Kerry on-air media blitz playing the victim, this is all taking affect, and I like most political junkies are waiting to see some polls. I bet though, and this is just a guess, but polling data is showing negatives towards Bush and even some slippage in some polls, why havent they come out yet? Because the MSM wants to save the polls for post convention to show Bush in a bad light. This is a guess of course, and I am probably wrong but polls have been usually coming out once every couple of days, save the Rassmusen(sp?) daily which I dont fully trust, and the polls have seemingly stopped coming.

Maybe its only worth a penny but this is my 2 cents.


21/08/2004

I am a conservative, make no bones about it. I believe in less government, a strong national defense, I believe abortion is wrong and immoral and homosexuality is a choice and not something you are born as. That doesnt mean government doesnt have its place outside of National Defense or that sometimes I do struggle with the idea that abortions may be needed occasionally. I also dont judge people on there choice to be gay, hey in the end they have to answer to the same G-D as I do right? Its just my right and conviction that if asked I will tell them they are wrong and I dont agree with there position. Ask any gay friends I have and they will tell you they respect me because I still respect them and never waiver on that conviction, but I do not push my ideology off on them.

Which is why I am writing this, not because of homosexuality or abortion. Its the fact that many of my conservative friends and acquantences tend to take there christian faith to an extreme. The christianity I grew up in was non-judgemental. Why tell somebody about the speck in there eye but ignore the log in your own, right? Jerry Falwell has consistently said "Hate the sin, Love the sinner" , all to often though evangelicals, which I am one of in my own way( I will explain later on) , tend to hate the sin and ignore the sinner rather than love them. I say all of this because many older christian conservatives dont like Britney Spears. I fully agree that Britney is a bad influence on young teens, is far to erotic, although being fairly young I dont mind that too much :-). But the fact is we the Republicans of America get a bad rap because of a handful of closeminded individuals who think there G-D says condemn all who dont believe. The last I checked Britney is a Christian(maybe, last I heard she was checking out Kabbalah), she may have ignored some tenants of faith but she is still(maybe) a Christian. Rather than judge her, open up to her, lead by example with an open heart rather than toss her aside and move her to the sidelines of humanity where she can do great damage to herself and to others. We are a big party, we are a loving people, but we can be too judgemental and that has been whats killing us. So lets give Britney that chance, let her perform at the GOP convention, if she turns into a left-wing hack we will have only ourselves to blame in the end.

On my religion, I believe I am Evangelical. I grew up in a Catholic family went to a Mennonite Church and when I was older I attended a Nazerene Church. I am never afraid to let people know who I believe in. But I do not attend church regularly. After reading the bible I have come to a conclusion that Christianity was meant to be a close private thing. You arent supposed to perform rituals or repeat prayers, save one. Although its great to hear the message a Pastor brings, he still is just talking to you and it is up to the individual to do with it what he may. After all this is just my belief.

Some random thoughts today.

I went to a VA Psychologist the other day as part of my Title 31 benefits and he was testing me for Vocational Rehabilitation, the test consists of three parts. The first part is an IQ test, the second is a vocational test (you know the tests that determine what field you are best at, like an ASVAB to those of you who know what that is) and a Psychological evaluation.

Well on the IQ test I scored extremely well, surprisingly well. It was the Stanford-Binet 3rd(maybe 5th) version I believe I took and came out Extremely Gifted, no numbers were given at the time but he said he believed I scored in the high 160's range. Not bad considering my education level, and the level of the test given combined. Believe it or not according to him my language skills, vocabulary and logic centers where far above the average man,

The second part was the vocational testing. I scored very highon 4 areas, high in another and average on the third. The average one was a dexterity test, having to do with typing. It was performed on an old notebook computer, so I believe the score on that is skewed, considering I have carpal tunnel and it was performed on a keyboard half the size of the average keyboard.

The third was the Psychological test. Now this part was very interesting. I came out of it being apathetic and low self-confidence. Not apathetic in the way about the world that surrounds me, but apathetic in my own future which also leads it into my lack of self-confidence which is the barrier which has kept me from taking my obvious mental gifts and actually applying them. As the good doctor told me, he has never met a 30 y/o with as high an intelligence as me with so little to show for it, part of it has to do with my choldhood but I wont get into such a personal subject in such a public manner.



20/08/2004

There is a hot campaign for the presidency of the republic. One side is accused of being AWOLwhile serving in the National Guard. The campaign season is overheated when the democratic party puts forward a propogandic documentary meant to belittle and tell lies about the republican. No one from the leading party asks for it to be removed or threatens lawsuits, they believe in a free press and freedom of speech. A few months later a commercial comes out accusing the democratic party candidate of lying about his war record. The democatic party candidates does nothing for two weeks other than threaten lawsuits against TV stations who air it. After a couiple of weeks the book from these veterans is released rising to number 3 on the NYTimes bestseller list. The democratic party candidate once agian threatens lawsuits, this time against the book sellers. Not once, mind you, have they actually threatened a lawsuit against the authors or the veterans mentioned in the book. They accuse them of being a front for the republican party, but they dont tell you that there 527's, funded by huge democratic donors Soros, Lewis and a few other liberal billionaires, have accused the president of being a NAzi, run ads calling him a liar, members of there party comparing individual republicans of having brownshirts. Sorry but all of this does seem like 1930's Germany accept the Nazis arent rightwing in this scenario.

19/08/2004

There are three numbers coming that the Bush team should be prepared for: 1000, 9-3, 9-11

1000 is the number of troop deaths likely to hit before the November elections. I believe the media has been lying fairly low on Iraq lately, and it makes me curious. Najaf is a huge hotspot right now and should be dominating headlines but it isnt, why is that? Sure its gets plenty of attention, but not quite like it was in May. This leads me to believe that they are cleaning there guns and are planning on making 1000 a magical number and they probably have some sort of magical number comparisons primed for attack.

9-3 is the jobs report after Bush's acceptance speech on 9-2, if it isnt over say 200,000 the press will use the "low" job growth numbers to overshadow any post-convention coverage he may have, a tricky situation for Bush and Rove to work with and its completely out of there hands.

9-11 is the only number that will help Bush, but watch out for a VFW style protest to happen, I wouldnt doubt it if a few of Teresa Heinz's sycophant 9-11 families do some sort of back turning on Bush, but unlike the VFW soldiers who called Kerry a liar and turned there backs to him the press will jump on this like flys to sh*t or bees to honey.

Unfortunately all of these situations will be outside of Bush's control and I see no way that Bush and Co. can counteract them, but there is one good thing and thats the fact the electorate is so divided and the Republicans are so united that even with all that the race will still be close.

11/08/2004

Well the Democrats have there guns out and they are collectively aiming at there own feet, again. Today they are saying that Bush's nomination of Porter Goss to be CIA director is purely political, other than the fact that all posts nominated by a President is political the statement is absolutely stupid. When Tenet announced his resignation, both Democrats and Republicans both where almost instantly saying that Goss was the perfect pick to be CIA Director. Look at his record, military intelligence, undercoverr CIA operative, Chairman of the Select House Commitee on Intelligence you will find no man better situated to head the CIA. Nancy Pelosi, before she flip-flopped(a new democrat tactic?) said she fully supported him, but now since its a political season she doesnt. Remember the Democrats said we should act on the 9-11 Commision reccomendations immediately without thought, but I guess a new CIA Director is someone who should be delayed due to Democratic division( sorry democrats YOU guys are the ones being dividers not the other way around). This only spells disaster for the Dems just like in 2002 when the Dems figured it was smart to play politics with the War on Terror( Daschle and other leaders were th first ones to put politics into play on the WOT folks, only 2 years removed and they have rewritten history but thats alright) SO if history plays right again the Dims will be on the losing side of the issue yet again because of the constant politicizing of everything that moves in Washington.

03/08/2004

Its funny watching the hypocritical hollywoody's. On the one hand they cry about there first amendment rights when they want there opinion known but when there fans speak out its censurship how dare they express an opinion contradictory to my own. I was reading a column about this radical left pastor who supports abortions, homosexuality and other lefty positions and calls the christian right intolerant and then he goes on to say that we need to make sure the christian right has no voice and they are as dangerous as the taliban. Tolerance right? The left is full of these people and its not based on intelligence, reasonong or understanding its based on hate. They hate the fact your views are opposite of theres. They hate the fact that you have a moral fiber. They hate the fact that you research and learn the facts independently of theres. And most of all they hate the fact that you are Christian. Thats why they hate Bush.

Notice closely lately the left is using a new tactic. They are attempting to use the bible to convince you that you are wrong. Meryl Streep conveniently says Jesus was a pacifist while ignoring many aspects of his teachings, such as his anger towards the money changers or the fact that in Luke 22:36, Jesus commands His disciples to buy swords and strap them on: "Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." . Why Jesus was anti-capitalist when they fail to mention the parable of the talents, remeber the guy who went to hell was the one who didnt risk his money or make money. Jesus does say what good is money in his kingdom but remember he also says he does not want money from those who are forced to give. Jesus wasnt a capitalist nor was he a communist, socialist or any other -ist, he was more than likely a libertarian excluding the give unto caesar what is caesars rhetoric,Jesus whole heartedly believed in the free-will endowed unto man by his father. Why feed a man a fish when you can teach him to fish for a lifetime, its not just a saying its a real aspect of spiritual and physical life.

Its not enough to give a man something, that only teaches dependency. Its not enough to tell a man he is a sinner, that only sends him a way. In both manners you must be taught why and how. How do I learn to fish? How does homosexuality affect my soul? But overall any man taught to fish or believe in G-D must also do so willingly, otherwise you have taught a man a skill he wont use and a sinner lieing to keep you off his back.


01/08/2004

Interesting news today, other than the terror alert level going up, Kerry received a negative bounce from the convention among likely voters, a negative 5% bounce to be exact according to the latest gallup, usatoday cnn poll. Not since 1972 has a candidate had a negative bounce. Of course the election is still very close and only time will tell how it will all end up, my feeling is come the GOP coonvention the electorate will begin to make there choices known, and thats good news for Bush since his convention and his speech will be the last major one prior to the election with a narrow window between the convention and the election, only worry along the way will be the debates.

Saw Kerry and Edwards talking today on how we alienated our "allies" on Iraq. Geez i'm sorry did I miss something? Wasnt it the French who promised us they would support it but backed out at the last moment? Germany is Germany and I am not going to judge them as harshly, they have a myriad of personal demons to deal with as does Russia, which had large amounts of debt and oil owed to them by Iraq. But France is a different story they doubletalked us they lied to us they alienated US not the other way around people. They accepted bribes from Saddam. So for a man who wishes to become President and blames the trans-atlantic riff solely on us will find that the American people are far smarter than he gives them credit for. Also the fact that other than France, Germany, Russia and a couple of other nations the MAJORITY of Europe was with us, at least there governments were. Lets not forget also that almost immediately after 9-11 it was the Europeans and the hard American left that blamed America first, there newspapers were hitting us hard and its there media that has been anti-American for years, so lets balance the answer, its not that America alienated its "allies" its that our "allies" and european media that has alienated us.

Interesting news today, other than the terror alert level going up, Kerry received a negative bounce from the convention among likely voters, a negative 5% bounce to be exact according to the latest gallup, usatoday cnn poll. Not since 1972 has a candidate had a negative bounce. Of course the election is still very close and only time will tell how it will all end up, my feeling is come the GOP coonvention the electorate will begin to make there choices known, and thats good news for Bush since his convention and his speech will be the last major one prior to the election with a narrow window between the convention and the election, only worry along the way will be the debates.

Saw Kerry and Edwards talking today on how we alienated our "allies" on Iraq. Geez i'm sorry did I miss something? Wasnt it the French who promised us they would support it but backed out at the last moment? Germany is Germany and I am not going to judge them as harshly, they have a myriad of personal demons to deal with as does Russia, which had large amounts of debt and oil owed to them by Iraq. But France is a different story they doubletalked us they lied to us they alienated US not the other way around people. They accepted bribes from Saddam. So for a man who wishes to become President and blames the trans-atlantic riff solely on us will find that the American people are far smarter than he gives them credit for. Also the fact that other than France, Germany, Russia and a couple of other nations the MAJORITY of Europe was with us, at least there governments were. Lets not forget also that almost immediately after 9-11 it was the Europeans and the hard American left that blamed America first, there newspapers were hitting us hard and its there media that has been anti-American for years, so lets balance the answer, its not that America alienated its "allies" its that our "allies" and european media that has alienated us.


free hit counter